China GEO is not a translation of English-language GEO work. The target engines differ, the language differs, and the cited sources differ. This page sets out what an international brand actually has to solve to be retrieved and quoted inside a Chinese-language answer, and how we handle it.
These engines answer Chinese questions and cite Chinese-language pages. A site with English content only is rarely retrieved by them, however well it ranks in Google. That is a corpus and source-distribution fact, not a technical defect.
ByteDance's assistant, the largest consumer deployment. Its cited sources overlap only partially with Baidu's index.
Tencent's assistant. It leans on Chinese Q&A and news properties and is sensitive to whether an entity's Chinese description stays consistent.
Answers in a structured register, with comparatively stable citation of explicit factual sentences and visible dates.
Alibaba's model, strong on shopping and business-service queries, where the Chinese wording of product and brand names carries real weight.
Long-context retrieval, so it will read longer Chinese explanatory content rather than short snippets.
Shares an index with Baidu, but now adds generated summaries, and classical ranking alone does not predict its citations.
| Dimension | Western engines | Chinese engines |
|---|---|---|
| Primary language | English | Chinese |
| Heavily weighted sources | English media, communities, specialist sites | Chinese news, Q&A, industry sites |
| Shared index | No | No |
| Typical blocker | Missing entity data | Language mismatch, plus missing entity data |
| Chinese content required | Optional | Required |
A CNY 1 retrieval-based report shows where your brand currently stands across these engines. It does not rely on a generative model, so it returns quickly, and what it returns is verifiable fact rather than a subjective score.
Chinese content written as conclusion-first, self-contained paragraphs that can be quoted on their own. Every factual claim carries a source and a date, and nothing unverifiable is written.
One company name, one description, one set of registration details, one product wording, identical everywhere, so engines can cross-check you without finding contradictions.
Content is distributed to Chinese platforms and re-checked monthly. Citation windows expire, so this is continuous maintenance rather than a one-off delivery.
These ranking systems are not public. No agency can guarantee an outcome against them.
We do not use bulk posting or manufactured engagement to fake signals.
Work that did not happen is not written up as a case. There is no wall of result screenshots here, because that kind of claim cannot be verified.
| Plan | Price | Fits |
|---|---|---|
| Starter report | CNY 1, one-off | Confirming your position before committing |
| China market plan | CNY 3,680 per quarter | Brands whose audience is primarily Chinese |
| Overseas standard plan | CNY 3,980 per quarter | Four English articles plus distribution to eight overseas platforms |
Send the brand name, your target keywords and your website URL. The URL matters: when an engine is asked who you are, a domain match is more reliable than a brand-name match.
One that prepares a foreign brand's public information so Chinese AI engines can retrieve, quote and attribute it correctly.
Doubao, Yuanbao, DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi and Baidu AI Search. They share no index and cite different sources.
Yes. These engines answer Chinese questions and cite Chinese pages, so an English-only site is rarely retrieved.
Two quarterly plans, CNY 3,680 and CNY 3,980, plus a one-off CNY 1 starter report before any larger commitment.
No. Citation depends on non-public ranking systems. We commit instead to a specific, checkable source and a visible date on every claim.
Send the brand name, target keywords and website URL. We start from verifiable facts about where you currently stand.